Trial document

This study has been imported from without additional data checks.
drksid header


Trial Description

start of 1:1-Block title


Perioperative Chemotherapy With FOLFOX Plus Cetuximab Versus Adjuvant FOLFOX Plus Cetuximab for Patients With Resectable Liver Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma

end of 1:1-Block title
start of 1:1-Block acronym

Trial Acronym


end of 1:1-Block acronym
start of 1:1-Block url

URL of the Trial


end of 1:1-Block url
start of 1:1-Block public summary

Brief Summary in Lay Language

Is a perioperative chemotherapy based on FOLFOX and Cetuximab (K-RAS wild-type) associated
with a higher rate of postoperative complications in patients with resectable colorectal
liver metastases as compared to only adjuvant FOLFOX and chemotherapy? Are there any
differences for disease free survival between periand postoperative treatment in patients
with >3 liver metastases or at least one metastasis > or = 5 cm in diameter?

end of 1:1-Block public summary
start of 1:1-Block scientific synopsis

Brief Summary in Scientific Language

In recent years chemotherapy based on FOLFOX and cetuximab has become a standard treatment
in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Recently, the analysis of the CELIM trial
reported response rates of 70% in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver
metastases treated with FOLFOX + Cetuximab. 46% of the patients had their metastases R0 or
R1 resected or a ablation by radiofrequency with an overall 34% R0 resection rate. In recent
studies, adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX leads to a prolongation of disease free survival
after successful resection of colorectal liver metastases, but there is not sufficient data
concerning a perioperative regimen. In only one study of Nordlinger et al. a trend in
progression-free survival could be reached in patients receiving a perioperative
FOLFOX-therapy, but without reaching statistical significance. Furthermore those patients
displayed a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications and morbidity. Although
the advantages of perioperative treatment are not proven, this concept has become more and
more popular in recent years, mainly because of a lack of guidelines. Thus the aim of our
study is to compare the complication rate of both therapeutical concepts. Furthermore,
secondary objectives (disease-free survival, overall survival, resection rates, response
rates, toxicities and quality of life) will be used to estimate the efficacy, feasibility,
and safety of both regimens. Perioperative treatment probably has a better efficacy in
patients with high tumor burden (>3 liver metastases or one metastasis > or = 5 cm in
diameter) with effect on disease free survival and will be investigated in a subgroup

end of 1:1-Block scientific synopsis
start of 1:1-Block forwarded Data

Do you plan to share individual participant data with other researchers?


end of 1:1-Block forwarded Data
start of 1:1-Block forwarded Data Content

Description IPD sharing plan:


end of 1:1-Block forwarded Data Content
start of 1:1-Block organizational data

Organizational Data

  •   DRKS00003685
  •   2012/05/08
  •   2010/12/20
  •   yes
  •   [---]*
  •   [---]*
end of 1:1-Block organizational data
start of 1:n-Block secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

  •   NCT01266187  (
  •   CTC-A10-005  (RWTH Aachen University)
end of 1:n-Block secondary IDs
start of 1:N-Block indications

Health Condition or Problem studied

  •   Liver Metastasis
  •   C78.7 -  Secondary malignant neoplasm of liver
  •   C18 -  Malignant neoplasm of colon
  •   C20 -  Malignant neoplasm of rectum
end of 1:N-Block indications
start of 1:N-Block interventions

Interventions/Observational Groups

  •   Procedure: adjuvant surgery + FOLFOX + cetuximab
  •   Procedure: perioperative/Folfox + cetuximab
end of 1:N-Block interventions
start of 1:1-Block design


  •   Interventional
  •   [---]*
  •   Randomized controlled trial
  •   Open (masking not used)
  •   [---]*
  •   Active control (effective treament of control group)
  •   Treatment
  •   Parallel
  •   N/A
  •   [---]*
end of 1:1-Block design
start of 1:1-Block primary endpoint

Primary Outcome

- Clavien score (> grade 1); time frame: 1 year; The first primary objective of the study is to compare the postoperative complication rate according to Clavien score (> grade 1) of a perioperative chemotherapy with a postoperative regimen
- Disease free survival; time frame: 1 year; A second primary objective of the study is to compare for the patient subgroup with >3 liver metastases or at least one metastasis > or = 5 cm in diameter the median disease free survival.

end of 1:1-Block primary endpoint
start of 1:1-Block secondary endpoint

Secondary Outcome

- Secondary objectives; time frame: 5 years; Secondary Objectives:
To compare the overall disease-free survival.
To compare the overall survival.
To compare operation, resection and R0 rates.
To compare the safety and chemotherapy-associated toxicity (NCI-CTC V4.0)
To compare the effect of a perioperative therapy on healthrelated quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 + QLQ-LMC21).
To compare the number of cycles, dose intensity and dose modifications applied.
To evaluate the response rate (RECIST V1.1 no confirmation of response needed) after preoperative chemotherapy.
Resected liver mass

end of 1:1-Block secondary endpoint
start of 1:n-Block recruitment countries

Countries of Recruitment

  •   Germany
end of 1:n-Block recruitment countries
start of 1:n-Block recruitment locations

Locations of Recruitment

end of 1:n-Block recruitment locations
start of 1:1-Block recruitment


  •   [---]*
  •   2011/07/31
  •   430
  •   [---]*
  •   [---]*
end of 1:1-Block recruitment
start of 1:1-Block inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  •   Both, male and female
  •   18   Years
  •   no maximum age
end of 1:1-Block inclusion criteria
start of 1:1-Block inclusion criteria add

Additional Inclusion Criteria

- Signed written informed consent obtained prior to any study-specific procedure.

- Age > 18 years

- Proven K-RAS wildtype in primary tumour or metastasis tissue

- Diagnosis of resectable metachronous metastases after complete resection (R0) of
primary tumour without gross or microscopic evidence of residual disease. or
Diagnosis of resectable synchronous metastases after complete resection (R0) of
primary tumour more than 1 month before study or Diagnosis of resectable synchronous
metastases with sufficient evidence (i.e., CT scan or diagnostic laparoscopy) that
both the primary tumour and liver metastases can be completely resected during the
same procedure and resection of primary can be delayed 3-4 months.

- Negative pregnancy test

- Highly effective contraception during treatment and for at least 3 months thereafter
in women (defined as pearl index < 1) and men, if the risk of conception exists

- Planned start of study medication between 0 and 3 weeks post randomization

- ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (Appendix 1)

- Adequate hematology: neutrophils > 1,5 /nl, platelets > 100/nl, INR < 1,5, aPTT < 1,5

- Adequate biochemistry: total bilirubin < 1,5 x UNL, ASAT and ALAT < 5 x UNL, alkaline
phosphatase < 5 x UNL, serum creatinine < 1,5, x UNL.

end of 1:1-Block inclusion criteria add
start of 1:1-Block exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

- Patients with any relationship of dependence to the sponsor or the investigator

- Patients committed to an institution (court-ordered or by official orders)

- Extrahepatic metastatic disease

- Proven K-RAS mutation or unknown K-RAS mutational status in tumour tissue

- Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy within 1 year before randomization

- Neuropathy > or = grade 3 (NCI-CTC V4.0) during prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

- Any prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease

- Previous treatment with EGFR antibodies

- Prior non-colorectal malignancies, except adequately treated basalioma of the skin or
carcinoma in situ of the cervix.

- Bleeding diathesis or coagulation disorders

- Females with a positive pregnancy test (within 14 days before treatment start) or
breast feeding

- Fertile women (<2 years after last menstruation) and women of childbearing potential
not willing to use effective means of contraception

- History of psychiatric disability judged by the investigator to be clinically
significant, precluding informed consent or interfering with compliance for drug

- Clinically significant (i.e. active) cardiovascular disease, e.g. cerebrovascular
accidents (<6 months prior to randomization), myocardial infarction (<1 year prior to
randomization), Congestive heart failure (NYHA Grades III or IV), uncontrolled
hypertension while receiving chronic medication, unstable angina pectoris,
significant arrhythmia

- Known peripheral neuropathy, including oxaliplatininduced

> or = grade 1 (NCI-CTC V4.0). Absence of deep tendon reflexes being the sole
neurologicl abnormality does not render the patient ineligible

- Known DPD-deficiency (Dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenase)

- Organ allografts requiring immunosuppressive therapy

- Serious, non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture

- Serious intercurrent infections (uncontrolled or requiring treatment)

- Current or recent (within 28 days prior to randomisation) treatment with another
investigational drug or participation in another investigational study

- Any contraindications against study medication (including auxiliary substances)

- Patients unwilling to consent the saving and propagation of pseudonymized medical
data for study reasons

end of 1:1-Block exclusion criteria
start of 1:n-Block addresses


  • start of 1:1-Block address primary-sponsor
    • RWTH Aachen University
    end of 1:1-Block address primary-sponsor
    start of 1:1-Block address contact primary-sponsor
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    end of 1:1-Block address contact primary-sponsor
  • start of 1:1-Block address scientific-contact
    • RWTH Aachen University Hospital
    • Ulf P Neumann, Prof. 
    end of 1:1-Block address scientific-contact
    start of 1:1-Block address contact scientific-contact
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    end of 1:1-Block address contact scientific-contact
  • start of 1:1-Block address public-contact
    • Ulf P Neumann, Prof. 
    end of 1:1-Block address public-contact
    start of 1:1-Block address contact public-contact
    end of 1:1-Block address contact public-contact
end of 1:n-Block addresses
start of 1:n-Block material support

Sources of Monetary or Material Support

  • start of 1:1-Block address materialSupport
    • Bitte wenden Sie sich an den Sponsor / Please refer to primary sponsor
    end of 1:1-Block address materialSupport
    start of 1:1-Block address contact materialSupport
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    •   [---]*
    end of 1:1-Block address contact materialSupport
end of 1:n-Block material support
start of 1:1-Block state


  •   Recruiting ongoing
  •   [---]*
end of 1:1-Block state
start of 1:n-Block publications

Trial Publications, Results and other Documents

  • [---]*
end of 1:n-Block publications
The parameters in and DRKS are not identical. Therefore the data import from required adjustments. For full details please see the DRKS FAQs .
  •   116
  •   2013/10/30
* This entry means the parameter is not applicable or has not been set.